Jawapan Kepada Dakwaan Goldziher

Mengenai kajian atau dakwaan Goldziher;

Petikan conclusion sebuah tesis page 355 (link)

The preceding study, based upon on analysis and detailed study of the evidence, has shown that among that which Goldziher cites as testimony and which is the subject of this research, there is not a single piece of evidence to support his hypothesis of 

1 The involvement of the Companions of the Prophet in fabricating Hadith and attributing them to him.

2. The existing of disputes between the Umayyads and the pious scholars.

3. The involvement of the Umayyads in the falsification Hadith, or in the exploitation of certain pious scholars in order to justify what they sought to do, including the opposing certain other pious scholars.

4. The involvement of Umayyad sponsored theologians or leaders in the fabricating of Hadith to the benefit of the Umaayyads or their governments.

5. The involvement of Pious scholars in the fabrication of Hadith in general and against the Umayyad in particular.

Hence, all of the people who are the subject of Goldziher's accusations are in fact innocent of these accusation. 

Buku rak Periplus

- - - - -